Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, 94-200, Yeongdeungpo-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 150-030, Seoul, Republic of Korea. cardioguy@korea.ac.kr

Wake Heart and Vascular Associates, Wake Heart Center, 3000 New Bern Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27610, USA.

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. G.Amoroso@olvg.nl

Centre for Coronary Artery Disease, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China. yyj58@yahoo.com

Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, No.123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Sung Township, Kaohsiung County, 83301 Taiwan, ROC.

Cardiology Department, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy. stefanorigattieri@yahoo.it

Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Division of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital- Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University Collage of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan. takenori@med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp

Unidad de Cardiologia Intervencionista, Medtec, Hospital Meixoeiro, Vigo, Spain.

Wake Heart and Vascular Associates, Wake Heart Center, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Kangwon Province, South Korea

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effects and optimal application time of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream (EMLA-C) in relieving wrist pain during transradial coronary procedures (TRCP). METHODS: The Phase I study enrolled 147 patients to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the EMLA-C during TRCP. The Phase II study was designed to evaluate the optimal preprocedure application time frame of EMLA-C for wrist pain reduction in 400 patients. The EMLA or placebo cream was applied at the puncture site from 2 to 4 hours before the procedure in Phase I, and randomized to 5 time groups according to the time of drug application in Phase II. We evaluated wrist pain by the visual analogue scale (VAS) or verbal rating scale (VRS-4), and evaluated complications as well. RESULTS: EMLA-C demonstrated greater pain relief by VAS (control: 49+/-24, EMLA: 19+/-22; p = 0.001) and VRS-4 (control: 2.3+/-0.5, EMLA: 1.5+/-0.6; p = 0.001), and there was a negative correlation (r = -0.476; p = 0.001) between VAS and the preprocedure application time of EMLA-C. In Phase II, there was a significant difference in pain levels between the control and 1- to 2-hour groups by VAS (control: 49+/-29, EMLA1-2 hours: 32+/-24; p = 0.001) and VRS-4 (control: 2.4+/-0.6, EMLA1-2 hours: 1.9+/-0.6; p = 0.001). Drug-induced local erythema frequently occurred in the 3- to 4-hour group (6.6%) and >4 hours group (11.9%). CONCLUSIONS: EMLA-C can be effective in reducing wrist pain during TRCP without any significant drug-related complications when the application time is 1 to 3 hours before the procedure.

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. joe5977@ms32.hinet.net

BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino fistulae contribute to significant morbidity in hemodialysis patients. These fistulae normally are treated through a retrograde venous approach. There are no data regarding a transradial approach. Furthermore, measurement of pressure reduction in the radial artery appears to be useful. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 50 interventions to treat 49 patients (17 men, 32 women; mean age, 61.8 +/- 10.6 years) with Brescia-Cimino fistulae. Inclusion criteria were patients with palpable radial arteries and dysfunctional end-to-side Brescia-Cimino fistulae. Patients with infected fistulae, contrast allergy, upper-arm/synthetic graft/central-vein stenosis, and end-to-end Brescia-Cimino fistulae were excluded from the study. Radial arterial pressures before and after angioplasty were compared as a surrogate of stenosis relief. Anatomic and clinical success rates were calculated. RESULTS: Sixty-five stenoses and 4 total occlusions were treated through radial access. All radial punctures were successful, except in 1 patient. Most lesions were located in the cephalic vein (87%). Mean length of treated lesions was 4.1 +/- 2.8 cm. Mean pretreatment diameter of lesion stenoses was 76.7% +/- 12.1%. Mean posttreatment diameter stenosis was 22.6% +/- 8.2% (P < 0.001). Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures recorded from the radial artery decreased from 130 +/- 40, 60 +/- 18, and 87 +/- 27 to 88 +/- 40, 43 +/- 18, and 60 +/- 26 mm Hg (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001), respectively. The anatomic success rate of the transradial approach was 91.3%. The clinical success rate of the transradial approach was 96%. CONCLUSION: The transradial approach is a feasible and highly effective approach to treat dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino fistulae. Measuring blood pressure reduction through the radial artery appears promising as a hemodynamic evaluation method.

Sahlgrenska Academy at Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden.

The purpose of this study was to describe patients' experience during and after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Data were collected by interviews with 14 patients. A qualitative content analysis approach was used. Four main categories were identified that describe patients' experience of the hours during and following intervention: emotional thoughts, bodily sensations, nursing intervention of importance, and personal strategies. All patients made a comment on staff conduct and pointed out that even minor nursing actions may be of great importance. Patients were most positive toward the transradial approach. Even though the approach via arteria radialis will increase, many patients will still have their procedure done via arteria femoralis. In spite of all research and technical developments, the patients' experience from intervention via arteria femoralis is pretty much the same as it was 1997.

Division of Cardiology, Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine, 162 Ilsan-dong, Wonju 220-701, Korea.

We evaluated the feasibility of the transradial coronary intervention (TRCI) in 85 consecutive patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO). Clinical, angiographic and procedural factors were compared between the success and failure groups. An overall success rate of 65.5% (57 of 87 lesions) was achieved with TRCI, and the most common cause of failure was an inability to pass the lesion with a guidewire. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the most significant predictor of failure was the duration of occlusion (OR 1.064 per month, 95% CI 1.005 to 1.126, p = 0.03). The procedural success rate improved with use of new-generation hydrophilic guidewires. The 6 Fr guiding catheters were used in the majority of the 70 cases (81%). Five cases were crossed over to a femoral artery approach due to engagement failure of the guiding catheter into the coronary ostium because of severe subclavian tortuosity and stenosis in two cases, radial artery looping in one case, and poor guiding support in two cases. There were no major entry site complications. In conclusion, the radial artery might be a feasible vascular route in coronary interventions for CTO, with comparable procedural success and no access site complications

Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.

OBJECTIVE: We previously showed that factorial score of somatization, which was obtained by the examination of symptom checklist-90 (SCL-90), was higher in patients received transfemoral coronary catheterization than norm. The aim of the present study was to compare the patient's psychologic status between transradial approach and transfemoral approach percutaneous coronary catheterizations. METHODS: A total of 198 inpatients (105 transfemoral, 93 transradial) underwent scheduled first time coronary catheterizations were enrolled. All patients were studied by symptom SCL-90 on present psychologic status 24 hours before and 24-48 hours after coronary catheterizations. RESULTS: Age, sex, weight, smokers, employment, educational background, marriage status, family relations, family history of cardiovascular disease, income and medical insurance status were similar between the two groups. There was also no difference in diabetes, hypertension history as well as coronary heart disease confirmed by coronary catheterization between the 2 groups. Compared with the status before the procedure, factorial scores of somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, global severity index and total positive symptoms were significantly reduced after percutaneous coronary catheterizations (1.50 +/- 0.51 vs. 1.64 +/- 0.53, 1.50 +/- 0.48 vs. 1.67 +/- 0.55, 1.28 +/- 0.41 vs. 1.38 +/- 0.49, 1.42 +/- 0.43 vs. 1.55 +/- 0.53, 1.38 +/- 0.41 vs. 1.58 +/- 0.54, 1.32 +/- 0.35 vs. 1.44 +/- 0.41, 1.38 +/- 0.34 vs. 1.49 +/- 0.42, and 23.08 +/- 17.30 vs. 27.72 +/- 18.79, respectively, P all < 0.05). Scores on somatization, depression and positive symptom severity index were significantly lower in patients received transradial coronary catheterizations than those received transfermoral coronary catheterization approach (1.52 +/- 0.51 vs. 1.62 +/- 0.53, 1.43 +/- 0.54 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.43 and 2.36 +/- 0.66 vs. 2.50 +/- 0.43, respectively, P all < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients' psychologic status improved significantly after percutaneous coronary catheterizations. Improvement on psychologic status is significantly better in patients underwent transradial coronary catheterizations than that underwent transfemoral coronary catheterizations.

Dextrocardia (DC) is a rare cardiac condition in which the cardiac location, as well as apex, is rightwardly displaced. As the incidence of atherosclerotic disease is similar to that of the general population, there have been few reports of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in these patients. Proposed technical strategies for successful angiography and PCI in DC include counter-directional torquing of the catheter, as well as right-left mirror-image inversion angiographic views. All previous reports of DC PCIs have been via transfemoral access.We present a case of successful repeat transradial PCI in a patient with DC. This is first report of transradial coronary angiography, PCI, or repeat PCI in a DC patient. A literature review of technical considerations, including our own recommendations for guide catheter selection, are discussed. We also review the anatomic variations and epidemiology of DC. Although access complications for transradial PCI is known to be lower than that of the transfemoral approach, challenges in technique and concern of repeat access have limited the popularity of the former. Our report demonstrates the safety and feasibility of transradial angiography, PCI, and even repeat PCI, in the rare patient with DC. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Hopital Laval, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie, affilie a l'Universite Laval, 2725 Chemin Ste Foy, Quebec, Canada G1V 4G5. Olivier.Bertrand@crhl.ulaval.ca

BACKGROUND: Systematic use of coronary stents and optimized platelet aggregation inhibition has greatly improved the short-term results of percutaneous coronary interventions. Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions have been associated with a low risk of bleeding complications. It is unknown whether moderate- and high-risk patients can be discharged safely the same day after uncomplicated transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 1005 patients after a bolus of abciximab and uncomplicated transradial percutaneous coronary stent implantation either to same-day home discharge and no infusion of abciximab (group 1, n=504) or to overnight hospitalization and a standard 12-hour infusion of abciximab (group 2, n=501). The primary composite end point of the study was the 30-day incidence of any of the following events: death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, major bleeding, repeat hospitalization, access site complications, and severe thrombocytopenia. The noninferiority of same-day home discharge and bolus of abciximab only compared with overnight hospitalization and abciximab bolus and infusion was evaluated. Two thirds of patients presented with unstable angina and approximately 20% presented with high-risk acute coronary syndrome prior to the procedure. The incidence of the primary end point was 20.4% in group 1 and 18.2% in group 2 (P=0.017 for noninferiority) with a troponin T-based definition of myocardial infarction; the incidence of the primary end point was 11.1% in group 1 and 9.6% in group 2 (P=0.0004 for noninferiority) with a creatinine kinase myocardial band-based definition of myocardial infarction. No death occurred. Rate of major bleeding in both groups was extremely low at 0.8% and 0.2%, respectively. From 504 patients randomized in group 1, 88% were discharged home the same day. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that same-day home discharge after uncomplicated transradial coronary stenting and bolus only of abciximab is not clinically inferior, in a wide spectrum of patients, to the standard overnight hospitalization and a bolus followed by a 12-hour infusion. This novel approach offers a safe strategy for same-day home discharge after uncomplicated coronary intervention.

Department of Cardiology, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. yigitfatma2000@yahoo.com

OBJECTIVE: The radial approach has been increasingly used as an alternative to femoral access. The purpose of the present study was to assess the feasibility, success, and safety of the transradial approach (TRA) for diagnostic coronary angiography, and to describe the difficulties associated with the technique as compared with transfemoral approach (TRF). METHODS: A series of 180 consecutive patients were divided to TRA or TFA groups by two operators. We compared the groups regarding procedural time, access time, fluoroscopy time, procedural failure, complications, contrast volume, length of hospital stay, and number of used coronary catheters. RESULTS: The number of used coronary catheters was not different between the two groups (p = 0.6). Total hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the radial group (p <0.0001) than in femoral one. We found differences between the radial and femoral groups in the success rate (p<0.0001), contrast volume (p = 0.012), procedural time (p<0.0001), access time (p<0.0001), and fluoroscopy time (p<0.0001). We did not find any major complication in the radial group. There was a major bleeding in the femoral group. CONCLUSION: The TRA is a safe alternative to femoral catheterization although with lesser procedural success, longer procedural access, and radiation time, and more contrast volume.

G. Kuppuswamy Naidu Hospital, Cardiology Department, Coimbatore, India.

OBJECTIVE: To study the suitability of the aberrant radial artery (ARA) as an access site for coronary angiography and angioplasty. BACKGROUND: In certain situations, the radial artery operator finds that the right radial artery in its usual location is unsuitable for a transradial procedure (TRP). In such cases, the ARA should be considered as an alternate access site. METHODS: Between January 2002 and December 2004, all patients considered suitable for a TRP with a clinically absent radial artery, or a small radial artery and a palpable ARA, underwent a TRP using this vessel as an access site. We describe the technical aspects and the differences that this approach entails, in comparison to the standard radial artery approach to TRPs. RESULTS: Of the 3,610 patients considered suitable for a TRP, 22 patients underwent 29 procedures using the ARA as an access site [22 angiograms and 7 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures (PTCAs)]. The median age of the patients was 55 years, with 19 males and 3 females. All procedures using the aberrant radial artery were successful. None of the patients developed spasm or an access site complication. The mean fluoroscopy time for angiography in the right radial artery group was 4.6 minutes, and 4.8 minutes for the ARA group. The procedure timed were 24 minutes and 32 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSION: The aberrant radial artery can be used as a safe alternate access site for coronary angiography and angioplasty when the right radial artery at the usual site is not suitable.

Department of Cardiology, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Osaka, Japan

The native radiocephalic (Brescia-Cimino) fistula is usually constructed with an anastomosis of the cephalic vein and radial artery. Catheter interventions for native fistula failure have until now been performed via the transcephalic or transbrachial approach. Transradial intervention for native fistula failure was prospectively evaluated for a selected consecutive 11 patients. Six patients had a single lesion and 5 patients had double lesions. Twelve lesions were stenotic and 4 were occlusive with thrombus. Balloon angioplasty alone was successful in 10 lesions. In thrombosed fistulas, 2 lesions underwent manual catheter-directed thrombo-aspiration and 2 further lesions underwent a combination of catheter-directed thrombo-aspiration and mechanical thrombectomy. Cutting Balloon angioplasty was performed for 3 resistant venous stenoses and for 1 radial artery stenosis. Technical and clinical success were achieved in all patients. No vessel rupture or perforation was observed in this study, nor was distal embolization in the radial artery or symptomatic pulmonary embolism. No radial artery occlusion or fistula infection was seen during the follow-up. The primary patency rates were 82% at 3 months and 64% at 6 months. Transradial intervention for native fistula failure is considered safe and feasible in a selected population; yet requires further validation.

Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, Lancashire, England, United Kingdom.

We examined the safety and feasibility of elective outpatient transradial coronary angioplasty (PCI). Four hundred and forty two patients underwent procedures over a 4-year period. Over 95% had an excellent angiographic result and 85% were discharged the same day. Radial access was successful in 417 (94%) patients. There were no major vascular complications. One patient died of a subacute stent thrombosis. Outpatient transradial PCI is safe and feasible for the majority of elective PCI cases.

Aims: Radial artery spasm remains the major limitation of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of vasodilators in the prevention of radial artery spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions. Methods and results: 1,219 patients were consecutively randomized to receive placebo (n = 198), molsidomine 1 mg (n = 203), verapamil 2.5 mg (n = 409), 5 mg (n = 203) or verapamil 2.5 mg and molsidomine 1 mg (n = 206). All drugs were administered through the arterial sheath. The primary end point was the occurrence of a radial artery spasm defined by the operator as severe limitation of the catheter movement, with or without angiographic confirmation. Main characteristics including age, sex, wrist and arterial sheath diameters and procedure duration were identical across the groups. The rate of radial artery spasm was lowest in patients receiving verapamil and molsidomine (4.9%), compared to verapamil 2.5 mg or 5 mg (8.3 and 7.9%), or molsidomine 1 mg (13.3%); and placebo (22.2%) (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Radial artery spasm during transradial percutaneous interventions was effectively prevented by the administration of vasodilators. The combination of verapamil 2.5 mg and molsidomine 1 mg provided the strongest relative risk reduction of spasm compared to placebo and should therefore be recommended during percutaneous coronary interventions through the radial approach.

The radial artery has become a popular conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery. However, limited information has been provided regarding the atherosclerotic nature of this artery, which may affect both the immediate intraoperative difficulties and long-term graft patency. METHODS: We examined intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images of the radial artery in patients with coronary artery diseases. Cross sections of the radial artery were assessed using the following factors: lumen diameter, lumen area, vessel diameter, vessel area, plaque area, percent plaque area, and extent of calcium deposition. RESULTS: The IVUS images were obtained from radial arteries of 58 patients (47 men, average 67 +/- 9 years) during transradial procedures; ie, transradial coronary angiography and/or transradial coronary intervention. Mean luminal diameter was 3.28 +/- 0.69 mm and 3.00 +/- 0.70 mm at the proximal and distal segments, respectively, and 2.58 +/- 0.73 mm at the minimal lumen cross section. A percent plaque area greater than 50% was seen in five radial arteries (8.6%) whose average plaque length was 26.4 +/- 30.8 mm. Of these, one showed a plaque length greater than 50 mm, and another showed vessel caliber less than 2.0 mm. Five of 58 radial arteries (8.6%) showed calcium deposition, two of which showed diffuse calcification (> 50 mm). Thus, among 58 radial arteries, four (6.9%: one with diffuse arteriosclerosis, one small radial artery, two with diffuse calcification) were considered unsuitable for bypass conduit. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative evaluation of the radial artery is recommended in order to prevent unnecessary exploration of the forearm and to improve graft patency.
 

A case series and technique of transradial cardiac catheterization with cardiac biospy are described. Transradial cardiac catheterization is perceived to be limited to arterial procedures. Using the veins of the forearm, we have converted many previous femoral arterial/venous cardiac procedures to a transradial/forearm approach. Retrospective review of patients undergoing transradial procedures with concurrent cardiac biopsies was undertaken. A convenience sample of transfemoral procedures with biopsies performed by the same operator was identified for comparison. Coronary angiography/left heart catheterization was performed using standard transradial/femoral approaches. A 7 Fr introducer sheath was placed via a large median forearm or femoral vein. Right heart catheterization was done using a 120 cm balloon-tipped catheter and endomyocardial biopsy was performed with a 7 Fr biotome. Both groups were then compared for baseline characteristics and procedural events. Transradial (n = 8) and transfemoral (n = 12) procedures were all done for postcardiac transplantation management. There was no crossover between groups. Durations of the radial procedures (median, 73 min; range, 40-95) were similar to transfemoral procedures (median, 68 min; range, 45-105). No procedural complications were reported. Endomyocardial biopsy plays an important role in the diagnosis of transplant rejection and identification of pathological processes that cause myocardial dysfunction. Transradial cardiac catheterization has some clear advantages over a transfemoral approach. Bilateral cardiac catheterization with concurrent cardiac biopsy is technically feasible using a transradial/forearm approach. This approach offers an alternative approach for selected patients in need of cardiac biopsy.

The study reports our single center experience in transulnar coronary interventions in 122 consecutive cases. Success rate was 85.2%. Vascular complications were low (5.7%) and minor (6 hematomas and 1 pseudoaneurysm treated by compression). Transulnar catheterization is feasible and safe. It represents a useful alternative to the transradial approach in selected cases.

The transradial approach for coronary catheterization is now a routine technique without serious complications at the puncture site. We report a case of complex regional pain syndrome type II (CRPS type II) in the hand after the transradial coronary intervention, which may alert medical personnel that the technique may cause serious regional pain with disability. A 61-year-old woman underwent coronary intervention via the right radial artery for the treatment of unstable angina. After the operation she complained of severe pain in the right hand, consistently felt along the median nerve distribution. The nerve conduction study suggested carpal tunnel syndrome. We made a diagnosis of CRPS type II, and the patient received stellate ganglion blockade, cervical epidural blockade, and administration of amitriptyline and loxoprofen. The symptoms gradually improved and her activities of daily living markedly improved. The median nerve appeared to be damaged by local compression and potential ischemia. Careful attention should be paid to avoid CRPS type II, associated with excess compression

The authors present their experience in performing a transradial approach for neuroendovascular surgery of intracranial vascular lesions when a transfemoral approach was unfavorable. METHODS: Eight patients ranging in age from 52 to 88 years underwent a total of nine neuroendovascular procedures for intracranial vascular lesions. A transradial approach was used in all patients. The patients had previously undergone a transfemoral approach for the endovascular intervention, but that procedure was unsuccessful. Five patients had intracranial basilar artery (BA) aneurysms, one patient had symptomatic BA stenosis, one patient had a dural arteriovenous fistula in the posterior fossa, and one patient had a high-flow arteriovenous malformation in the frontal lobe. In each case, a transradial approach achieved a stable platform that allowed intracranial microcatheterization for neuroendovascular intervention. None of the patients experienced complications attributed to the transradial artery approach. CONCLUSIONS: During neuroendovascular surgery for the treatment of intracranial lesions, the transradial approach is a viable alternative if the transfemoral approach is unfavorable. This series represents the first known description of neuroendovascular surgery for intracranial lesions via a transradial approach.

We examined vasospasms of the radial artery after a transradial approach was used for coronary angiography or angioplasty. In forty-eight patients (39 males and 9 females), arteriography of the radial artery was initially performed just after the transradial approach was used for coronary angiography and/or angioplasty. Then, five months later, a second arteriography of the radial artery was obtained after a transbrachial approach was used for coronary angiography. First and second arteriographies were compared to evaluate vaso-spasms of the radial artery. In the present study, more than 75% stenosis in the radial artery, 25-75% stenosis, and less than 25% stenosis were tentatively defined as severe spasms, moderate spasms, and mild spasms, respectively. In arteriographic studies on the radial artery, twenty-four patients (50%) had severe radial artery spasms, eleven patients (23%) had moderate spasms, and thirteen patients (27%) had mild spasms. The diameters of both the proximal and distal radial arteries in the severe spasm group were significantly smaller than those in the mild and moderate spasm groups (proximal site: severe group 2.39 +/- 0.70 mm versus mild group 2.98 +/- 0.46 mm, P < 0.05, and moderate group 2.96 +/- 0.77 mm, P < 0.05, distal site: severe group 2.26 +/- 0.60 mm versus mild group 2.73 +/- 0.47 mm, P < 0.05, and moderate group 2.86 +/- 0.71 mm, P < 0.05). We concluded that vasospasms of the radial artery occurred in most patients after the transradial approach. Furthermore, severe radial spasms were strongly correlated with the size of the diameter of the artery.

The recent advent of drug-eluting stents has allowed the crush stenting technique to be adopted, thus simplifying the treatment of bifurcation coronary artery lesions. However, this can only be achieved in 7 Fr or greater guiding catheters, hence precluding most transradial percutaneous coronary interventions that are usually undertaken using 6 Fr or less guiding catheters. We assessed the feasibility of balloon stent crush as a stepwise procedure in achieving bifurcation crush stenting in 6 Fr transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Since it is not possible to place two stents through a 6 Fr guiding catheter, we have adapted the crush stenting technique by initially placing a stent in the side branch and a balloon in the main vessel. The side branch stent is then deployed against the main vessel balloon that is later inflated, crushing the side branch stent within the main vessel. The main vessel is then stented and the side branch recrossed for kissing inflations. Seven patients (five males; age range, 47-78 years) with bifurcation lesions were treated using the above-described technique without major complications. Balloon crush of the side branch stent were successfully achieved in all cases without balloon trapping. In six cases where side branch recrossing was attempted, all were successful and kissing balloon inflations were undertaken in five cases. We have demonstrated that the modified crush stenting technique is feasible and can be safely adapted for use in a 6 Fr transradial percutaneous coronary intervention approach. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
 

BACKGROUND: The transradial approach has not been evaluated for "rescue" percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor following failed thrombolysis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and procedural outcomes of the transradial and transfemoral approaches to rescue PCI. METHODS: Rescue PCI cases with adjuvant GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor performed at two centres were reviewed retrospectively, and the bleeding rates, equipment use and procedure times for the femoral and the radial approach were compared. RESULTS: Radial access was attempted in 47 of 111 cases (42%) and crossover to femoral access was required in two cases (4%). Major bleeding occurred in three patients in the radial group (6%) and in 12 patients in the femoral group (19%; P=0.06). Radial access was associated with less access site-related major bleeding (0% versus 9%; P=0.04) and fewer transfusions (4% versus 19%; P=0.02). After excluding patients with intra-aortic balloon pump, this difference was no longer statistically significant (4% versus 8%; P=0.7). Fluoroscopy times and contrast use were similar, and the time to first balloon inflation was slightly longer with radial access (33 min versus 30 min; P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, the transradial approach for rescue PCI is safe and effective. The present findings warrant further study in a prospective, randomized trial.

Recently, the combination of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and adjunctive PercuSurge device support has been reported to be superior to conventional primary PCI in terms of immediate angiographic results. However, there are no data regarding 6-month angiographic results for either the treatment site or the site of the distal protection balloon. The purpose of this study was to address these two issues. Between May and November 2002, a total of 74 patients who had experienced acute myocardial infarction (AMI) underwent either primary PCI (48 patients within 12 hr of AMI) or elective PCI (26 patients with AMI of > 12 hr and < 72 hr) using the PercuSurge device through a transradial approach. The final TIMI 3 flow and myocardial blush grade >/= 2 achieved were 94% and 93%, respectively. Of these patients, three died in the hospital, two died in the third month after discharge, and the remainder of the patients were followed up in our outpatient department for a mean of 13 +/- 2.9 months. Six-month angiographic follow-up was performed in 85.5% (59/69) of patients. The angiographic restenotic rate (defined as >/= 50% restenosis at the target lesion site) was 22.0% (13/59) of patients. However, only 11.9% (7/59) of patients required repeat target vessel revascularization. Moderate obstruction at the site of the distal protection balloon was found in 5.1% (n = 3) of patients during PCI. Six-month angiographic results demonstrated that all three patients had significant stenosis at the site of the distal protection balloon that required PCI. PercuSurge device utilization during PCI in the clinical setting of AMI yielded a substantially higher rate of immediate final TIMI 3 flow in epicardial vessels and increased the integrity of the microvasculature. Combined therapy of PCI with the PercuSurge device appeared to have favorable late angiographic results at the target site. Late significant stenosis occurred at the site of the distal protection balloon if a preexisting moderate or more advanced atherosclerotic lesion was present there.
 

The purpose of this study is to describe a single operator's experience with the feasibility and safety of transradial access in conventional cerebral angiography. 153 patients were enrolled consecutively. Among them, 20 patients were not suitable for transradial access. A Simmons catheter was used. Haemostasis was achieved using a compressive dressing of the wrist. We analysed the success rates of the arterial puncture and the successful catheterization rate for each supra-aortic vessel as well as all complications. The arterial access was successful in 96.3%. The supra-aortic vessels were catheterized with success rates of 99.2% (127/128) for the left subclavian artery and 100% for the other arteries. The mean procedure time was 19.3 min (range 10-55 min). Haemostasis was successfully achieved in every case. The most frequent complication was arm pain which occurred in 37 patients (28.9%). In conclusion, transradial selective cerebral angiography with a reversed-angle catheter is technically feasible and safe. It might be helpful in imaging follow-up of patients with arterial stenting or coil embolisation of the cerebral aneurysms. Modification of the catheter design is required to improve the selectivity of the supra-aortic branches.

The purpose of this study is to describe a single operator's experience with the feasibility and safety of transradial access in conventional cerebral angiography. 153 patients were enrolled consecutively. Among them, 20 patients were not suitable for transradial access. A Simmons catheter was used. Haemostasis was achieved using a compressive dressing of the wrist. We analysed the success rates of the arterial puncture and the successful catheterization rate for each supra-aortic vessel as well as all complications. The arterial access was successful in 96.3%. The supra-aortic vessels were catheterized with success rates of 99.2% (127/128) for the left subclavian artery and 100% for the other arteries. The mean procedure time was 19.3 min (range 10-55 min). Haemostasis was successfully achieved in every case. The most frequent complication was arm pain which occurred in 37 patients (28.9%). In conclusion, transradial selective cerebral angiography with a reversed-angle catheter is technically feasible and safe. It might be helpful in imaging follow-up of patients with arterial stenting or coil embolisation of the cerebral aneurysms. Modification of the catheter design is required to improve the selectivity of the supra-aortic branches.

In this retrospective review of 5,234 cardiac catheterizations and percutaneous coronary interventions, the rate of vascular complications was highest in extremely thin and morbidly obese patients and lowest in moderately obese patients, consistent with the previously reported "obesity paradox." The use of transradial access and arterial access closure devices was associated with reduced vascular complications in the population of obese patients.

Direct stent implantation using radial approach represents to date the less invasive, less traumatic strategy to perform a percutaneous coronary intervention, rendering its adoption an attraction for many interventional cardiologists. A growing series of reports suggests the feasibility of transradial direct stenting in a variety of clinical situations. Here we discuss the main advantages of the adoption of this technique. Moreover, a detailed analysis of the technical issues specifically related with each phase of transradial direct stenting procedures is reported.

This prospective multicenter study was conducted to compare the incidence of significant vascular complications delaying hospital discharge after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between the radial approach (n = 192) and the femoral approach (n = 185) in octogenarians, a rapidly growing population with numerous risk factors for complications. By intention-to-treat analysis, the incidence of vascular complications was found to be significantly less in the radial group (1.6% vs 6.5%, p = 0.03), without any decrease in the efficacy of PCI and only a slight increase in procedure duration for coronary angiography. All vascular complications, except for 1, occurred in patients treated with the transfemoral approach.

OBJECTIVE: To assess stent implantation without previous dilation with a conventional balloon catheter to treat coronary artery obstructions, by using low profile guiding catheters and the transradial approach. METHODS: The transradial approach is attractive due to the possibility of avoiding the trauma caused by the balloon, its shorter time of performance, reduced exposure to radiation, and the use of lower quantities of contrast medium than those usually required in this type of procedure. RESULTS: The initial experience of direct stent implantation with low profile guiding catheters and the transradial approach was analyzed in 45 patients, whose mean age was 65 years. All procedures were successful, with no major complications in the in-hospital phase. CONCLUSION: The results obtained with the population studied proved that the transradial approach is safe, effective, and has very few risks of complications.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare, through a meta-analytic process, the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary procedures in terms of clinical and procedural outcomes. BACKGROUND: The radial approach has been increasingly used as an alternative to femoral access. Several trials have compared these two approaches, with inconclusive results. METHODS: The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and conference proceedings from major cardiologic associations were searched. Random-effect odds ratios (ORs) for failure of the procedure (crossover to different entry site or impossibility to perform the planned procedure), entry site complications (major hematoma, vascular surgery, or arteriovenous fistula), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as death, myocardial infarction, emergency revascularization, or stroke, were computed. RESULTS: Twelve randomized trials (n = 3,224) were included in the analysis. The risk of MACE was similar for the radial versus femoral approach (OR 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 1.48; p = 0.7). Instead, radial access was associated with a significantly lower rate of entry site complications (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.42; p < 0.0001), even if at the price of a higher rate of procedural failure (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.63 to 6.71; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The radial approach for coronary procedures appears as a safe alternative to femoral access. Moreover, radial access virtually eliminates local vascular complications, thanks to a time-sparing hemostasis technique. However, gaining radial access requires higher technical skills, thus yielding an overall lower success rate. Nonetheless, a clear ongoing trend toward equalization of the two procedures, in terms of procedural success, is evident through the years, probably due to technologic progress of materials and increased operator experience

BACKGROUND: Radial artery spasm (RAS) is a common complication of transradial approach (TRA) to percutaneous coronary angiography (CAG) and coronary intervention. Lower friction resistance between catheter and RA wall may reduce RAS upon insertion, manipulation, and withdrawal of the catheter. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of a hydrophilic-coated (HC) catheter, which has lower friction coefficient, could reduce the incidence of RAS compared with a non-hydrophilic-coated (NHC) catheter. METHODS: A total 250 patients attempted diagnostic CAG using 5-French catheters via the TRA between September 2000 and April 2002. Two hundred thirty-four (93.6%) patients who achieved successful coronary cannulation were selected for the study. NHC catheters were used in 149 patients (63.7%), and HC catheters were used in 85 patients (36.3%). We compared the incidence of RAS between NHC and HC catheters. RESULTS: RAS occurred in 17 (7%) patients totally. RAS was less likely to occur in HC group (one patient, 1%) than in the NHC group (16 patients, 11%, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the use of HC catheters can reduce RAS upon insertion, manipulation, and withdrawal of the catheter compared with NHC catheters

Introduction and objective. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction by percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting leads to excellent immediate clinical results and a good prognosis. The aim of this study was to compare in this selected population the safety and effectiveness of radial artery access versus femoral artery access.Patients and method. Between May 2001 and June 2003, 162 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction < 12 hours treated by percutaneous stenting were included in an observational study. The radial artery approach was used in 103 patients, and the femoral artery approach in the remaining 59 patients. The success of the procedure, incidence of major adverse cardiac events and local puncture complications were compared in patients treated with the radial artery versus the femoral artery approach.Results. Fluoroscopy time (22.4 [15.4] min vs 24.5 [19.5] min), immediate success of the procedure (96.1% vs 94.9%), and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (6.8% vs 8.5%) did not differ between the two groups. Bleeding complications due to local puncture were present only in the femoral artery access group (0 vs 5 patients; P=.007)Conclusions. In selected patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary stent implantation, the success rate and clinical safety of the radial artery approach are similar to those of the femoral artery approach, but the incidence of local complications, especially bleeding, is significantly lower in the former. Thus the radial artery approach should become the approach of choice in patients at high risk for bleeding complications.

We compared 5 versus 6 French (Fr) guiding catheters in coronary intervention using the transradial approach. Smaller guiding catheters may have advantages over larger ones in transradial coronary intervention. However, there is uncertainty about how small is small enough, and when smaller would become too small. Eligible patients were randomized between the 5 and 6 Fr groups before the procedure. The primary endpoint was procedural success. A total of 216 patients were randomized. Procedural success was obtained in 95% of the 6 Fr group versus 90% of the 5 Fr group (p = 0.25). Most of the failures in the 5 Fr group were because of cross-over to the 6 Fr group. Crossover to the 5 Fr group occurred in 1 patient in the 6 Fr group (0.9%; p = 0.05) because of a small radial artery. Transradial intervention using 5 Fr guiding catheters necessitates crossover to a 6 Fr catheter in 6.8% of cases, and offers no clear advantages over the 6 Fr technique.

Purpose: To report the use of a transradial approach to coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm in a morbidly obese patient.Technical Note: When the transfemoral approach was inaccessible in a morbidly obese patient with a ruptured intracranial aneurysm, coil embolization was performed via a 6-F sheath placed in the radial artery. Multiple platinum coils were delivered to exclude the 14-mm basilar tip aneurysm. Because heparin was not reversed, the sheath was left in the artery for 24 hours then removed. The radial artery was pulsatile, and blood supply to the hand was good.Conclusions: The radial artery appears to be a suitable route for access to the intracranial vessels when the femoral artery is not available.

Transradial cardiac catheterization is an increasingly popular technique mainly because of the low vascular complication rate. We report a case of arm deep vein thrombosis that may be related to a common puncture site hemostasis technique. This complication supports the use of specific unilateral compression hemostatic systems following transradial procedures.

Cardiac catheterization via the radial artery is associated with vascular complications, albeit less frequently than with the femoral approach. However, the management of these complications differs and is poorly described in the literature. We present our experience with vascular complications secondary to transradial access, with emphasis on their specific treatment.From January 2001 to October 2003 a total of 8159 cardiac catheterizations were performed, of which 3369 (41.3%) were done by radial artery approach. In 21 cases (0.06%) severe vascular hemorrhagic complications were observed (hematomas > 6 cm, n = 13; fistulas, n = 2; perforations, n = 5; pseudoaneurysm, n = 1). All patients were treated conservatively and none needed blood transfusions. A detailed description of the hemostasis techniques is provided.

We assessed the effect of transradial access (vs transfemoral access) for percutaneous coronary intervention on postprocedure length of stay and patient outcomes (in-hospital complications and all-cause and cardiac death at 6 and 12 months) in 225 elderly patients (>/=80 years old). Raw differences between transradial and transfemoral accesses were compared, and 3 forms of propensity score analysis were used to determine the true effect of transradial access. After matching to adjust for baseline differences in patient characteristics, remaining differences in outcomes and postprocedure length of stay were small and not statistically significant at the 95% level, but a decrease in postprocedural length of stay of nearly 1 day was observed and likely was not due to chance. Transradial access in patients >/=80 years old undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention should be preferred due to equivalent success rate and safety and likely reduction in postprocedural hospitalization.

We describe the technique of percutaneous carotid artery stent placement with distal protection in a patient in whom marked innominate artery ectasia prevented transfemoral access to the right common carotid artery. After induction of general anesthesia, ultrasound was used to guide direct puncture of the common carotid artery followed by the introduction of a 5 French sheath. A GuardWire distal protection balloon (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) was placed distal to the lesion and deployed at nominal diameter. A balloon-expandable stent was deployed without difficulty. Following stent placement, angiography demonstrated improved flow in the entire right carotid artery territory. There were no complications related to cervical soft tissue damage or clinical embolism. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged in 24 hours. Direct carotid access is acceptable in select patients in whom a transfemoral, brachial, or transradial approach is technically difficult. The use of distal cerebral protection devices may reduce cerebral embolism associated with these procedures.

Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a safe and effective method of percutaneous revascularization. However, there are no data on the efficacy of the transradial approach in left main (LM) PCI. We studied 80 patients (pts) who underwent LM PCI between February 1994 and January 2002, and compared the radial (27 pts) and femoral (53 pts) approaches. Patients were considered free of restenosis if they were free of angina and had a negative treadmill or nuclear imaging study 6 months post-PCI. Mean follow-up time was 27.4+/-23.0 months. Reason for PCI (stable angina, unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction) and lesion location (ostial, mid, distal) were similar in both groups (p>0.05), whereas mean ejection fraction was higher in the radial group (56.5+/-11.1% versus 49.2+/-14.7%, respectively; p<0.05). Sheath size (7 or 8 French; 44.4% radial versus 77.3% femoral) and amount of heparin used (9,192+/-3,645 IU versus 11,468+/-5,083 IU) were significantly larger in the femoral group (p<0.05), and the use of intra-aortic balloon pump was significantly more frequent (3.7% versus 22.6%). Mean fluoroscopy time (21.3+/-12.8 minutes versus 16.7+/-8.5 minutes), amount of contrast used (227+/-92 ml versus 225+/-85 ml), mean procedural time (67.0+/-27.6 minutes versus 73.4+/-32.7 minutes), procedure success (96.3% versus 98.1%), in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE; 7.4% versus 5.6%) and 6-month MACE (14.8% versus 25.5%) were similar in the 2 groups (p>0.05). However, major vascular complications occurred only in the femoral group (5.7%). Radial LM PCI is as fast and successful as the femoral approach and results in fewer vascular complications.

In the setting of acute myocardial infarction, thrombolytic therapy fails to restore an adequate epicardial flow in a large number of patients. Although an increasing number of patients undergoes a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after failed thrombolysis, this treatment has been poorly investigated. This review focuses particularly on the safety and prognostic impact of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors after failed thrombolysis. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors have been demonstrated to improve the clinical outcome in patients undergoing primary PCI. However, the increased risk of bleeding with the administration of potent antiplatelet drugs after full-dose thrombolytics has limited the widespread use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors during rescue PCI. We recently reported that abciximab treatment during rescue PCI has a beneficial effect on the short-term prognosis, without excess bleeding complications. This result can be achieved by using the radial approach, a low-dose weight-adjusted heparin regimen, and by limiting the use of aortic counterpulsation. In conclusion, in case of thrombolysis failure, patients should be referred to tertiary hospitals where rescue PCI can be performed with expertise.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) occurs in the presence of slowly progressive, long-standing stenoses of the visceral arteries secondary to atherosclerosis. Angioplasty and stenting are emerging as therapeutic alternatives to surgery in treating CMI. The transradial approach is an attractive alternative access for performing stenting in CMI at improved safety and ease. A case of CMI treated with stenting of the visceral arteries by both transradial and femoral approaches is presented here. The main difficulty in accessing the celiac and mesenteric arteries through the femoral approach is the angle between the aorta and these vessels, which often leads the operator to use multiple catheters. The main advantage of the radial approach (as well as the brachial one) is that it allows easy coaxial alignment of the catheter with the artery. The main problem is the inadequate length of the currently available catheters. The radial approach eliminates the risk for vascular complications and permits early ambulation.

A large infarct-related artery (IRA), which mostly contains high-burden thrombus formation (HBTF) and lipid pool-like plaque contents, has been suggested to play a pivotal role in the no-reflow phenomenon during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI). To reduce the thrombus burden of the IRA using the PercuSurge GuardWire device before intervention may be of crucial importance to preventing no-reflow. The purposes of this study were to test the transradial application (TRA) of this new mechanical device and to determine its impact on prevention of no-reflow during p-PCI. From May to September 2002, the PercuSurge GuardWire device was utilized in 42 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction and large IRA (vessel size >/= 3.5 mm with HBTF; group 1). From January to December 2000, p-PCI was performed in large IRA (vessel size >/= 3.5 mm) with HBTF using tranfemoral arterial approach in 101 consecutive patients (group 2). The angiographic and clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared in a chronologically consecutive manner. Successful reperfusion (final TIMI-3 flow) was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 patients (95.2% vs. 79.1%; P = 0.005). Moreover, the combined incidence of vascular complications, post-PCI thromboembolisms (defined as a distal embolism and a post-PCI residual thrombus score of >/= 3), and combined 30-day major adverse cardiac events were significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 patients (all P values < 0.05). In group 1 patients, post-p-PCI myocardial blush (MB) of >/= 2 grades was found to be more than 88.0%. Furthermore, when compared with preintervention, thrombus scores were significantly reduced after aspiration (P = 0.0001), whereas the minimal lumen diameter (P = 0.0001), TIMI flow grade (P = 0.0001), and MB grade (P = 0.0001) had all significantly increased after aspiration using Export Aspiration Catheter. There were no significant differences in corrected TIMI frame count (P = 0.42), TIMI flow grade (P > 0.5), or MB grade (all P values > 0.5) between postaspiration and post-PCI. The TRA of the PercuSurge GuardWire device during primary intervention of large IRA with HBTF was safe and feasible and provided benefits to patients. The initial successful reduction of the thrombus burden with this mechanical device before intervention can be translated into increased final TIMI-3 flow, a combined MB of >/= 2 grades, and fewer final thromboembolic events. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:503-511. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

BACKGROUND: Strategies for percutaneous coronary intervention are continuously evolving, in order to reduce complications and to warrant better immediate and long-term outcomes. We sought to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and long-term outcomes of a systematic strategy of coronary stenting without predilation (direct stenting) via a transradial approach for single-vessel procedures. METHODS: Stenting was performed with Snapper stent and wide inner-lumen, preformed, guiding catheters; 118 minimally-selected patients (59% of all single-vessel procedures performed at our center during the study period) were enrolled: among them 39% presented for acute coronary syndromes, 28% were under glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment, and 10% had a poor left ventricular function; 130 lesions were treated (1.1 stents/lesion): 53% were type B2/C, 8% longer than 20 mm, and 16% on bifurcations. RESULTS: The transradial approach was successful in 96% of cases; 7% required predilation. The immediate angiographic and clinical success rates were 100 and 98% respectively. No bleeding complications occurred when the transradial approach was successful. At 6 months, the mortality, major adverse events, recurrent ischemia, and target lesion revascularization rates were 0, 14, 15, and 10% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic strategy of direct stenting via a transradial approach for single-vessel procedures seems safe, feasible, and efficacious both immediately, and at 6 months of follow-up, even when treating complex lesions and/or high-risk patients.

Ikari is a new guide catheter for transradial intervention (TRI) that produces stronger back-up force by utilizing an unfavorable angle between the subclavian and brachiocephalic arteries. We report the initial results of the Ikari guide catheter based on the experience of a single center. Six operators performed a total of 102 coronary interventions for 91 patients using the Ikari guide catheter, while 101 interventions were performed with the transfemoral approach (TFI) during the same period. A left Ikari catheter was used in 63 procedures, and a right Ikari catheter was used in 39. The success rate for the procedure was 97% with a 6 French Ikari catheter. All failures were due to tortuous brachiocephalic arteries. For the Ikari procedure, the average fluorescence time was 14.5 9.5 minutes and the dye volume used was 153 53 ml; these results were equal to or better than those of TFI during the same period (20.1 12.2 minutes and 184 61 ml, respectively). These preliminary data suggest that an acceptable success rate can be achieved in TRI using appropriate guides, such as an Ikari catheter.

BACKGROUND: To avoid ischemic hand complications, the percutaneous transradial approach is only performed in patients with patent hand collateral arteries, which is usually evaluated with the modified Allen's test (MAT). This qualitative test measures the time needed for maximal palmar blush after release of the ulnar artery compression with occlusive pressure of the radial artery. The objectives were to evaluate the patency of the hand collateral arteries and to compare MAT with combined plethysmography (PL) and pulse oximetry (OX) tests before the percutaneous transradial approach. METHODS: Patients referred to the catheterization laboratory were prospectively examined with MAT, PL, and OX tests. PL readings during radial artery compression were divided into 4 types: A, no damping; B, slight damping of pulse tracing; C, loss followed by recovery; or D, no recovery of pulse tracing within 2 minutes. OX results were either positive or negative. Results of both tests were compared in 1010 consecutive patients. RESULTS: MAT results < or =9 seconds on either hand were seen in 93.7% of patients. PL and OX types A, B, or C on either hand were seen in 98.5% of patients. On the basis of the MAT < or =9 seconds criteria, 6.3% of patients were excluded from the transradial approach, whereas with PL and OX types A, B, and C, only 1.5% of patients were excluded. There was more exclusion in men and with increasing age by using both methods. CONCLUSIONS: In the evaluation of hand collaterals, PL and OX were found to be more sensitive than MAT. When applied to transradial approach screening, only 1.5% of patients were not suitable candidates for the transradial approach.

Coronary angiography and angioplasty are usually performed via transfemoral access. Though this route provides an easier vascular access, it is associated with a small but potentially serious incidence of vascular complications at the puncture site that may result in significant groin haematoma, blood transfusion or require surgical repair. A useful alternative approach is through the transradial access. This route has a very low rate of vascular complications and also allows early mobilisation of patients. We performed an analysis of our experience with transradial angiography and angioplasty, demonstrating this to be a safe and effective technique suitable for most patients.

Taking the transfemoral approach when performing a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft intervention is generally recognized as posing significant technical challenges. However, little has been reported on alternative transradial approaches to LIMA. In this report, we present our experience in a patient who had anastomosis-site LIMA graft stenosis and was successfully treated with direct stenting. We used a 6-French Kimny guiding catheter inserted through the left radial artery, even though the procedure was complicated by an acute occlusion of a LIMA body, requiring bail-out stenting following intra-aortic balloon pump support and temporary cardiac pacing. The patient was discharged 6 days after the procedure and remains asymptomatic during follow-up visits. Our results suggest that a transradial approach is feasible for LIMA intervention procedures

The transradial approach to coronary angiography has become a popular technique. Because of potential advantages, the transulnar approach has also recently been described. We report a successful case of transulnar catheterization with documented occlusion of the radial artery and normal inverse Allen test in a patient with limited vascular access.

The transradial approach for catheterization is becoming increasingly more popular. At present, the choice of the right or left radial artery depends on the operator's preference. We examined how the laterality influenced the effectiveness of the approach. Employing Judkins-type catheters, we performed coronary angiography in 232 patients with the left approach and in 205 patients with the right approach. Although access time did not differ between the two groups of patients, the duration of catheter manipulation was shorter in the left- than in the right-approach group (11.7 ± 5.9 vs. 9.8 ± 4.4 min; P < 0.001). Because of the shorter duration of catheter manipulation, the total procedural duration was shorter in the left-approach group (13.7 ± 6.4 vs. 11.4 ± 4.8 min; P < 0.001). The fluoroscopy time was shorter in the left- than in the right-approach group (3.7 ± 2.5 vs. 5.0 ± 3.3 min; P < 0.001). The amount of contrast material did not differ between the groups (79 ± 27 vs. 83 ± 25 ml). The rate of guidewire usage to engage the coronary ostium was higher in the right- than in the left-approach group because of the severe tortuosity of the right subclavian artery (20/205 vs. 0/232; P < 0.001). Thus, for operators with significant experience, the left radial approach may provide increased procedural efficacy for coronary angiography compared to the right.

The use of the radial artery for arterial access for left heart catheterization is gaining popularity. We report the first case of traumatic eversion endarterectomy following the removal of the arterial sheath after the cannulation of the radial artery. The patient has no long-term vascular compromise of the limb and did not require surgical intervention.

We devised a catheter designed for a transradial artery approach and carried out selective hepatic arteriography and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in 1999. To evaluate the clinical usefulness and safety of our new catheterization, we compared the results of transradial approach with those of the conventional transfemoral approach. In 164 (98.9%) of 166 patients in the radial group, hepatic arteries and the SMA were successfully visualized by an approach via the left radial artery. TACE via the radial artery was attempted in all 164 patients in whom the sheath was able to be inserted. When the amount of time required from puncture to sheath removal was compared, the two groups of patients showed no intergroup difference. Complications occurred in 4 patients (2.6%) in the radial group: there were 2 cases of temporary dull pain and 2 cases of numbness at the site of puncture, all of which improved after slight release of the tourniquet. In conclusion, the present study reported that TACE by our new transradial approach was found to have therapeutic efficacy comparable to that of the conventional transfemoral approach. This technique is only minimally invasive and is associated with few complications. We consider that the transradial artery catheterization may become a technique of first choice of TACE.

Introduction and objectives. Experience with 4 F catheters in cardiac catheterization is limited. These devices appear to be more suitable for the radial artery approach than conventional 6 F catheters.Methods. We analyze our preliminary experience with diagnostic catheterization of the radial artery with 4 F catheters. Angiographic images were evaluated using a predefined scale (1, poor; 2, acceptable; 3, optimal). In a subgroup of patients who underwent coronary angioplasty, the quantitative angiographic data obtained with the 4 F catheter were compared to those obtained with the 6 F guide catheter. In all cases the patients were clinically followed-up at 24 h and 7 days.Results. Two hundred and six studies performed over a 12-month period were reviewed. In 6 cases (2.9%) the femoral vein had to be used instead and in 4 cases (1.9%) the 4 F catheters were replaced by 6 F catheters. The left coronary angiography was graded as optimal in 83% and as acceptable in 15%. Right coronary artery images were considered optimal in 93% and acceptable in 7%. There was an excellent correlation between the reference diameter obtained by quantitative angiography with the 4 F catheter and values obtained with a 6 F guide catheter (r = 0.92; p < 0.01). No major vascular complications occurred.Conclusion. 4 F catheters are appropriate for systematic use in diagnostic procedures using the radial access.

Purpose: To describe the technique and feasibility of renal artery angioplasty and stenting from the radial artery. Methods: A series of 19 patients were evaluated for transradial renal artery intervention. Procedures were performed using carbon dioxide gas (CO2) as the preferred angiographic contrast agent. Intervention was performed through a 5 Fr radial artery sheath using low-profile balloons and balloon-expandable stents. Results: Nineteen patients with 26 stenosed renal arteries were considered for treatment via the radial route. A negative Allen's test precluded radial puncture in two (11%). In one patient the descending aorta could not be catheterized. Stenting from the radial route was successful in 22 renal arteries in 16 patients. On an intention-to-treat basis 16 of the 19 (84%) were treatable from the radial route. In the 17 patients with radial access technical success was 94% (16 of 17) patients and 91% (21 of 23) of renal arteries. One patient experienced a cerebrovascular event during intervention. Conclusion: Transradial renal artery intervention is technically feasible using low-profile angioplasty balloons and stents. This route offers advantages in renal arteries with a caudal angulation and in patients with diseases or tortuous iliac arteries.

Cutting balloon angioplasty can reduce the restenosis rate more than conventional balloon angioplasty, but is traditionally performed through a femoral artery. However, it is not clear how useful a transradial approach would be for cutting balloon angioplasty. This study was conducted to examine the safety, feasibility, and limitations of transradial as opposed to transfemoral cutting balloon angioplasty. From November 1999 to August 2001, 177 patients underwent cutting balloon coronary angioplasty. We compared the success rate, angiographic results, and complication rates of two groups of patients, those undergoing transradial (168 lesions from 153 patients) and those undergoing transfemoral (24 lesions from 24 patients) cutting balloon angioplasty. In both groups of patients who had similar clinical and target lesion characteristics. the percentage of lesions that required balloon predilation (27.4% vs 29.2%). stenting (7.7% vs 4.2%), and adjunct balloon dilation (28.0% vs 33.3%) due to dissection (35.7% vs 33.3%) or suboptimal results were comparable. Both approaches achieved a 100% primary success rate with similar acute gain (2.02 +/- 0.68 mm vs 1.94 +/- 0.70 mm), residual (luminal) diameter stenosis (19.2 +/- 11.7% vs 17.0 +/- 12.7%). proportion of lesions that achieved TIMI 3 flow (98.8% vs 100%), and clinical success rate (98.8% vs 95.8%). However, patients undergoing transradial cutting balloon angioplasty had earlier ambulation and a significantly shorter hospital stay than those undergoing a transfemoral approach (2.80 +/- 2.67 days vs 4.75 +/- 5.44 days, P = 0.005). We conclude that the transradial approach is a feasible and safe alternative to the transfemoral approach for cutting balloon angioplasty. In addition, it offers patients early ambulation and a short hospital stay.